CENSOJ queries N34 trillion 2025 duties waiver Implemented by Customs Service
…Says Waiver did not follow Due Process
A Non- governmental Organisation under the aegis of Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) has queried the N34 trillion 2025 customs duties waiver implemented by the Nigeria Customs Service, saying the development did not follow due process and procedure provided by the Fiscal Responsibility Act(FRA) .
The Lead Director of the Centre, Mr Eze Onyekpere in a statement regretted the recent revelation by the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS), while appearing before the House of Representatives Committee on Finance that it implemented the waiver
of N34 trillion worth of customs duties in the 2025 financial year.
“NCS stated that in accordance with enabling laws, they do not approve waivers, but implement the same on the authority of the Minister of Finance”.
Recall that the House of Representative Committee on Finance requested a comprehensive breakdown of the beneficiaries, the legal basis and purpose of the waivers from the NCS.
The Centre notes that customs duty waiver is a subset of tax expenditure and other tax expenditures which include all types of tax holidays and exemptions granted to various companies especially, to attract foreign investment in critical sectors.
It also said a proper account of the overall tax expenditure for 2025 will definitely be in excess of the customs duty waiver figures.
CSJ further recalls that the consolidated revenue accruing to the Federal
Government of Nigeria (FGN) in the 2025 financial year was N28.23trillion out of a targeted N36.35trillion.
According to the Centre, the value of the consolidated FGN revenue when compared with customs duties waiver raises several posers very fundamental to sound fiscal governance and the tenets of fiscal responsibility as stated in the Fiscal Responsibility Act.
“Pray, is it reasonable in an economy running a very high budget deficit for FGN to waive and forfeit more revenue than it retains on a scale of preference, economic wisdom,common sense and rationality, is it more reasonable to retain revenue duly accruing to FGN or to plunge Nigeria into a debt trap?”, it said.
“We forfeit and waive revenue that rightfully belongs to us and go cap in hand to creditors”, it queried.
It said section 29 (1) of the Fiscal Responsibility
Act (FRA) provides: “Any proposed tax expenditure shall be accompanied by an evaluation of its budgetary and financial implications in the year it becomes effective and in the three subsequent years, and shall only be approved by the Minister, if it does not adversely impair the revenue estimates in the annual budget or if it is accompanied by countervailing measures during the period mentioned in this subsection through revenue increasing measures such as tax rate raises and expansion of the tax base ”.
“The N34trillion customs duties waiver in 2025 did not follow the procedure provided by the FRA”.
According to the Centre, the question remains: Where is the evaluation of its budgetary and financial implication? Was it sent
to the National Assembly for approval? Approval by the Minister is contingent on the waivers not adversely impairing the revenue. The waivers negatively and adversely impaired the revenue.
Where is the documentation of the countervailing measures prepared by the Minister and approved by the National Assembly?
The Nigerian Tax Policy 2017 indicates that revenue forgone from tax incentives or concessions should be quantified against expected benefits and reported annually.
“Where the benefits cannot be quantified, qualitative factors must be considered. Pray, Nigeria has been granting tax waivers over the years, where is the annual reports quantifying the revenue waivers against accrued (not just expected) benefits?
In the light of the foregoing, CSJ and reasonable Nigerians are convinced that the tax expenditure regime has been mismanaged and abused.
It further said that any law conferring a huge discretion on any public officer to waive humungous revenues while deficits are rising and
Nigeria continues the endless borrowing jamboree is not a reasonable law in a democratic society.
CSJ therefore recommends that the National Assembly amends the relevant laws to ensure that all tax expenditure do not exceed ten percent of the actual revenue for the preceding financial year. The proposed tax expenditures should be laid with the Appropriation Bill before the National Assembly as a schedule to be approved with the
budget.
It called on the National Assembly through its legislative oversight, to ensure the enforcement of extant provisions of the FRA.
